Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12411/996
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Acurio Benavente, Paloma | - |
dc.contributor.author | Falcón-Cabrera, Giancarlo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Casas-Apayco, Leslie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Montoya Caferatta, Paola | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-23T21:24:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-23T21:24:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Acurio Benavente, P., Falcón-Cabrera, G., Casas-Apayco, L., Montoya Caferatta, P. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vita (2)27, 69-77. https://revistas.ulatina.ac.cr/index.php/odontologiavital/article/view/214/212 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://revistas.ulatina.ac.cr/index.php/odontologiavital/article/view/214/212 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12411/996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio fue comparar la resistencia compresiva de 2 resinas tipo Bulk fill y 2 resinas convencionales. Materiales y métodos: 136 muestras cilíndricas (2mm y 4mm), divididos en 8 grupos (n=17); G1 SonicFill™ (4x2mm), G2 SonicFill™ (4x4mm), G3 Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (4x2mm), G4 Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (4x4mm), G5 Filtek™ Z250 XT (4X2mm), G6 Filtek™ Z250 XT (4x4mm), G7 Te-Econom Plus® (4x2mm) y G8 Te-Econom Plus® (4x4mm). La resistencia compresiva fue evaluada con la máquina Instron® a una velocidad de desplazamiento fijo de 1,0mm/min. Los test de ANOVA, Kruskall Wallis, t Student y U de Mann Whitney fueron empleados para el análisis estadístico. Resultados: para las resinas Bulk Fill, Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (310,06-4x2mm, 303,87-4x4mm) mostró mayor resistencia compresiva que SonicFill™. Para las resinas convencionales, Filtek™ Z250 XT (295,9-4x2mm, 289,7-4x4mm) obtuvo mayor resistencia compresiva que Te-Econom Plus®. A la comparación de todos los grupos, Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill presentó los valores compresivos más altos en ambos espesores 4x2mm(0,122) y 4x4mm(0,333), con diferencias estadísticas significativas (p<0,001*-4x2mm, p=0,004-4x4mm). Conclusión: Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill puede ser una buena opción para restauraciones posteriores, ya que su propiedad mecánica de resistencia compresiva es superior en relación con las otras evaluadas. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was compare the compressive strength of 2 Bulk fill resin composites and 2 conventional resin composites. Materials and methods: one hundred and thirty six cylindrical samples (2mm and 4mm), divided in 8 groups (n = 17); G1 SonicFill™ (4x2mm), G2 SonicFill™ (4x4mm), G3 Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (4x2mm), G4 Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (4x4mm), G5 Filtek™ Z250 XT (4x2mm), G6 Filtek™ Z250 XT (4x4mm), G7 Te-Econom Plus® (4x2mm) and G8 Te-Econom Plus® (4x4mm). Specimens were evaluated to compressive stress test using Instron® machine at crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. One way Anova, Kruskall Wallis, Student’s t and U Mann Whitney tests were employed for statistical analyses. Results: For Bulk resin composites, Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (310.06-4x2mm, 303.87-4x4mm) showed higher compressive strength than SonicFill™. For conventional resin composites, Filtek™ Z250 XT (295.9-4x2mm, 289.7-4x4mm) showed higher compressive strength than Te-Econom Plus®. For comparison,Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill was higher compressive strength in both thickness 4x2mm (p=0.122) and 4x4mm (p=0.333) and it was statistically significant (<0.001*-4x2mm, 0.004-4x4mm) among them. Conclusion: Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill offers a good mechanical property like a compressive strength which is better in comparison to the others resin composites evaluated in this study. | - |
dc.language.iso | es | en_US |
dc.publisher | Odontología Vital | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | resistencia compresiva | en_US |
dc.subject | resinas compuestas | en_US |
dc.subject | materiales dentales | en_US |
dc.subject | Bulk fill | en_US |
dc.subject | compressive strength | en_US |
dc.subject | resin composites | en_US |
dc.subject | dental materials | en_US |
dc.title | Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of conventional resins vs Bulk fill composites | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Odontología Vital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License