Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12411/607
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAguirre, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorChaves, Sindy-
dc.contributor.authorBurban, Karen-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T17:03:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-30T17:03:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-13-
dc.identifier.citationAguirre, J., Chaves, S., y Burban, K. (2019). Adoption, adaptation, and use of mobiles by university students: a Central American example. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0130en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0130-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12411/607-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the actual uses of smartphones for university students while they are in the university, whether in the classroom or outside, to facilitate the use of mobile technologies in the university and in classroom activities. Design/methodology/approach: The site was the main campus of a university with a population of 10,000 undergraduate students; a convenience sample of 370 students was estimated for 246 usable surveys, with 95% confidence interval and 6.12 percent error. The proposed conceptual framework is based on the unified theory of technology acceptance. The instrument was developed on the basis of the literature and it was validated through a qualitative–quantitative process. The data were collected fact-to-face and the analysis consisted of the estimation of a general profile, mean and standard deviation and the development of the ordinal logistic regression model to test the hypothesis. Minitab 16 was the program used for the calculations. Findings: The instrument was found to be acceptable with a 0.90 α. The uses associated with the academic activities are: p8_1 search what I do not understand in the class, p5_1 read digital books, pdf and other documents, p9_1 study, p11_1 share course information and p2_1 take photos of class blackboard and another type of materials. For non-academic uses, the uses were: p14 calendar, p4 listening to music, p9 telephone calls and p7 interacting with new students. The adaptation of mobiles to university education has to harmonize students’ use, professors’ objections and institutional concerns; therefore, four elements are needed before a decision is made: professors’ training, teaching material development, infrastructure adaptation and a sound plan. Research limitations/implications: The selection of students was a convenience sample; therefore, the results cannot be extrapolated beyond the sample. Practical implications: The study clarifies the traditional idea popular in the area, that is, students use the mobile only for entertainment, and suggests ways to managerially deal with the issue in an orderly fashion, by investing in human capital, infrastructure and electronic teaching tools. Originality/value: The value is that the findings provide some ideas regarding the uses of smartphones for university students while they are in the university; such information can be used to orient strategies to develop educational uses of the smartphone.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Applied Research in Higher Educationen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectuniversityen_US
dc.subjectCosta Ricaen_US
dc.subjectacademicen_US
dc.subjectusesen_US
dc.subjectmobiles academicen_US
dc.subjectnon-academicen_US
dc.titleAdoption, adaptation, and use of mobiles by university students: a Central American exampleen_US
dc.typeArtículoen_US
Appears in Collections:Artículos publicados en revistas internacionales

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons